Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘sex’

Their stash of porn, that is.

Here, for example, is the utterly ridiculous notion that feminists who object to pornography — any pornography, apparently — are bigots. Yes, anti-porn feminists are bigots because they claim (to quote the guy): porn = violence against women. And that, he claims, is bigotry.

Oh my. Here’s the opening paragraph of the discussion thread he’s upset about:

Why is it, when the subject is pornography that degrades women, we are assured that viewing pornography has no influence on people’s actions, but so many today are convinced that Jim D. Adkisson did what he did because he listens to Right Wing commentators?

Adkisson wa the guy who shot up the Unitarian church, and listed a whole host of rightwing hatemongers among his reading list. I certainly think it’s a legitimate question she posed whether or not one is for or against pornography. But to Taverner’s fevered brow, it is bigotry. Apparently now porn consumers are (or should be) a protected group — ?? a minority?? (Oh, would that were the case! )

That’s not the only crazy/creepy idea he has. Here are a few more: (more…)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

1. Okay, Heather Wilson is bad, but not that bad.

One poor fool holds Congresswoman Wilson responsible for her husband’s alleged sexual assault of a teenage boy:

Anyone married to that beast would be capable of very evil sex deeds.

Sheesh. Is that sexism gratuitous enough for ya? It’s clear the guy doesn’t even mean it, yet simply has to say it anyway. Can’t stop himself. Ugly. Unnecessary. And yet it’s allowed to stand without being removed.

2. News stories on two of the North Carolina women murdered: Holly Wimunc and Nancy Cooper.

I’ve been thinking some more about the threat to our military women posed by our military MEN. More to come on that.

3. How to be a feminist activist without having to work too hard or risk jail at feministgal. Good piece. One of my first “lessons” about political activism was that merely voting is a form of activism.

4. Feministing does a very good job of revealing the bankrupt logic of PETA’s use of women’s naked bodies to capture public attention. (Is THAT gratuitous enough for ya?)

5. Everyone agrees: Purity Balls are creepy to the max.

Well, perhaps not the male half of those participating. But who knows?

There’s a very good reason for the overwhelming negative reaction by the rest of us. I think most psychologists would refer to the practice as incestuous on some level. Emotionally incestuous, perhaps. There’s something quite unnatural, I think, (not to mention highly inappropriate) about a father being overly interested in his daughter’s sex life.

Sure, he has a right to be concerned about her — but not quite to this extent and not in this way. Not to the extent he spends much time thinking or imaging or talking about it or having grown-up style formal dances around the subject. Not to the extent he makes her promise her sexual fidelity to HIM. No, no, no, not right at all!

To be honest, I think this practice is almost worse than being chattel. At least chattel has no overt sexual context.

We’ll talk more about sex and young women in the days to come too. I’ve got a lot to say on the subject.

Read Full Post »